National Investigators Exam (NIE) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the National Investigators Exam with our engaging quizzes. Test your knowledge with multiple choice questions and detailed explanations. Ace your exam with confidence!

Practice this question and more.


What is a potential consequence of persistent harassment?

  1. A warning from the authorities

  2. A civil injunction from the court

  3. A chance to meet the victim

  4. Immediate dismissal from work

The correct answer is: A civil injunction from the court

A civil injunction from the court is a possible consequence of persistent harassment because such behavior often leads victims to seek legal protection to prevent further harm. When harassment is sufficiently severe or ongoing, victims can file for an injunction, which is a legal order that restrains the harasser from continuing their behavior. This legal recourse is designed to enhance the safety and well-being of the victim, and it underscores the seriousness with which the legal system treats instances of harassment. By obtaining a civil injunction, victims can legally prohibit the harasser from contacting them or coming near them, thus providing a formal means of protection. While the other options may occur in certain circumstances, they do not necessarily align with the legal ramifications often sought by victims of persistent harassment. A warning from the authorities may be issued in some cases but does not offer the same level of protection and is not a guaranteed outcome. The chance to meet the victim would not typically be a consequence of harassment, as it may lead to further intimidation or distress for the victim. Immediate dismissal from work could happen if the harassment is related to the workplace, but it is not a direct legal consequence of persistent harassment and depends on the policies of the employer or the specific circumstances involved.